Monday, 3 May 2010

Elm St remake shows horror appeal

One of the basic tasks you have to fulfil for Media coursework is to show that there is an established audience for the genre you've chosen to work in, whether film or (for A2 from 2010-11) music video (+ poster + mag). Many of you have worked in horror; I've highlighted many examples from this regular FilmGuardian box office overview which you can check on the BritCinema and coursework blogs, but here's an excerpt from a very timely one:


A Nightmare On Elm Street scares up good business to take US No 1

Freddy Krueger's return is a sweet dream for Warner Bros as it prepares to mop up horror-film fans in the coming weeks when Iron Man 2 is expected to dominate
A Nightmare On Elm Street
He's back … Freddy Krueger in the new A Nightmare On Elm Street
The winner
Warner Bros' remake of A Nightmare On Elm Street, from its wholly owned production company New Line, went top of the pile on an estimated $32.2m (£21.1m). The studio has got to be happy with that, bearing in mind that the movie features no A-listers, would not have cost the earth to make, and will remain the only big horror in the market for a while. A few more weeks of modest holdover business beneath the radar of Iron Man 2 and Warner Bros top brass should be expecting a theatrical run to the order of $65-75m before they unleash it on DVD.

Saturday, 1 May 2010

80s boom: go old school?

When considering the style and look of your work perhaps you should consider amongst the options a retro approach? There has been a huge 80s turn in contemporary culture, from the music charts to the cinema screens, which this intriguing article (I've long argued a similar point and wholeheartedly agree with the analysis) puts down primarily to the age of the creatives and executives behind the media. The folk in control now are looking back to the 80s as 'their' age - the era when they were adolescents. It'll take 20-30 years but the noughties and then the tens will experience a similar retro boom in time, perhaps fuelled by some of you - just with inferior music and fashions!
From TisEng to Son of Rambow, not to mention Ashes to Ashes, movie versions of The A-Team, re-makes of Battlestar Galactica and horror icons such as Nightmare on Elm Street, the 80s revival is finally here!

From
April 23, 2010

Why Hollywood is remaking the Eighties

For today’s movie moguls it was the decade that rocked their world and they are certainly not going to let us forget it

The A Team, 2010 remake

Monday, 26 April 2010

Slasher + Rom-Com blogs

I won't have time to add much to these over the next few weeks, but have been adding links to useful articles etc to a couple of new blogs:
http://romcoms.blogspot.com/
http://dbhorror.blogspot.com/

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Feedback/suggestions on your blogs

I've been working through all your blogs this week. From this, some observations, and some suggestions:
  • IMAGES/HYPERLINKS/PRESENTATION
  • remember that you are assessed on the presentation of the blog itself!
  • incorporate images to illustrate your posts as you go, as well as hyperlinks (eg IMDB entries for film titles)
  • set aside some time to track back through your posts adding such images/links
  • ...don't copy/paste these in as they generally won't successfully appear; instead save the image, and then use the blogger image tool to upload it into your post
  • make use of the LINKS LIST gadget, which does help to make your blog take on a more multimedia, feature-laden look
  • these could be for various themes: useful books/sites/articles; key films - or even resources/reviews on one particularly key text; other useful blogs; your fellow group members' blogs; box office analysis; YouTube links for clips, openings, trailers etc; discussion lists linked to your topic; key companies (whether production, distribution or exhibition), eg WT is a big player in UK rom-com, Dimension Films in low-to-mid budget US horror - there are many possibilities
  • it would be useful to pair up with someone not in your group and give each other feedback on what they find useful in your blog, what they think might be added to give the reader better info, and perhaps also typos!
  • LENGTHY POSTS
  • avoid long, continuous paragraphs - bullet points are absolutely fine in the context of a blog, which above all should be user friendly:
  • the key guiding principle should be that information is easy to find, and easy to digest (you could for example provide brief explanations of any technical terms you use, such as convergence or synergy)
  • for any lengthy posts, provide a summary (preferrably bullet-pointed) at the beginning or end, changing the font (and maybe size, colour, bold etc) to help it stand out
  • THATS A NICE QUOTE FROM WIKIPEDIA, BUT...
  • ALWAYS make explicit what you've learned from your research, and...
  • ...which aspects of what you've read/(re)viewed are you going to (at least consider) applying to your own work?
  • Wikipedia is a great tool, but try to avoid relying on it - book-based research is invaluable, and using broadsheet newspapers such as The Guardian will help stamp your research with the hallmark of quality!
  • it is vital too that you always credit where you have learned anything you are writing on - it doesn't matter if you're not actually quoting, you should still provide the source (URL, book, etc) [there is a separate, more detailed post on this]...
  • or you risk, instead of earning marks for good research, being guilty of plagiarism, a serious offence in any subject, not just Media
  • NICE FILM, BUT WHO'S IT FOR?
  • this is fundamental to the way you're assessed: you must provide clear and detailed analysis of who your film will be aimed at
  • if you haven't, you really haven't engaged with the task
  • you'll see this is one of the 7 evaluation questions
  • if you go on to A2 Media, we return to this question of Audience, and specifically consider this in the context of your own practical work
  • the BLOG CHECKLIST section on Audience runs to several pages - make use of this! I've also added further posts on the Coursework + BritCinema blogs
  • establishing a target audience includes looking at box office returns for films within your genre, which may help to argue that there is indeed an audience for such movies. Try to make sure you include some British examples in this!
remember, at the heart of the coursework task is the idea that you're emulating, as far as you can, an actual film production company! film producers have to persuade investors that the film package they have attained the rights to can turn a profit - and so do you!
  • GENRE, GENRE, GENRE
  • 3 very important words there!
  • again, if you don't engage with the concept of genre, your mark will suffer
  • its important that you've provided a clear and detailed summary of the genre conventions, as well as analysis of a good range of genre openings
  • don't rely purely on Wikipedia for your genre knowledge!!!
  • this is a prime candidate for...
  • [THE CAMERA LOVES ME]
  • ...starring in your own videos...
  • ...feel free (its a good idea, and will help the look of your blog!) to use videos in place of written work within posts
  • the discussion format - we've looked at examples of this, which you can review on the blog - works well, especially if you shoot with 2 cameras and add in some relevant stills to break up the footage of your wise gaze!

Thursday, 8 April 2010

Box Office(Mojo) by Genre

You can examine the history of US box office for your genre/s at https://secure.boxofficemojo.com/genres/?ref=ft
The following example is for the slasher genre:

https://secure.boxofficemojo.com/genres/chart/?id=slasher.htm (accessed online 8.4.10 - always worth noting as online material can alter!); it should help you justify the choice of genre in terms of its established box office appeal (though you'll also need some UK box office examples).
[You can compare this with a variety of other horror sub-genres at the site, and/or thrillers:
Thriller - Erotic 42 Fatal Attraction $156.6
Thriller - Political 52 Air Force One $173.0
Thriller - Psycho / Stalker / Blank from Hell 30 Fatal Attraction $156.6
Thriller - Serial Killer 46 Hannibal $165.1
]

Horror - Slasher

1978-Present
Note: Many slasher movies from the '70s and '80s have no box office records, and, hence, do not appear on this chart.

TOTAL GROSSES | OPENING WEEKENDS

RankTitle (click to view)StudioLifetime Gross / TheatersOpening / TheatersDate
1 Scream Dim. $103,046,663 1,994 $6,354,586 1,413 12/20/96
2 Scream 2 Dim. $101,363,301 2,688 $32,926,342 2,663 12/12/97
3 Scream 3 Dim. $89,143,175 3,467 $34,713,342 3,467 2/4/00
4 Freddy Vs. Jason NL $82,622,655 3,014 $36,428,066 3,014 8/15/03
5 The Texas Chainsaw Massacre NL $80,571,655 3,018 $28,094,014 3,016 10/17/03

Thursday, 1 April 2010

Young Film Critic comp

There isn't any spare class time to spend on this, but you may be interested in this:

The Young Film Critic of the Year competition is open to any student aged 4-19yrs that is resident in Great Britain or Northern Ireland. There are four age ranges, with matching categories for those with a sensory impairment.
The winners are announced every October during a ceremony at BAFTA. The 2009 event was hosted by BBC Blue Peter presenter Joel Defries and featured appearances by a range of film personalities, including the actor Tom Felton.
The competition aims to empower young people of all ages to become their own critics of film.
Young Film Critic of the Year is produced as part of National Schools Film Week by our charity, Film Education. The 2010 competition is currently open for entries in all categories.

See  http://www.filmeducation.org/youngfilmcritic/ to find out more.


For example, you could be writing on how you liked the early Roadrunner work but then the standard dropped...

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

grab PrintScreen for Macs

You'll be wanting screen grabs at various points, but probably won't know how to on a Mac.
This web-page (here as a Word doc) shows you how.

.....


There is an alternative I wasn't aware of until reading a post in Emmie's blog (always acknowledge your sources!*): the grab tool. This wiki entry tells you all you need to know!

*and Emmie in turn acknowledges Lucy M actually flagged this up!

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

Moderator's report

I'll copy in below the exam board report on some resubmitted coursework from this January. If you read through this you should pick up some useful points which have been highlighted in the guides given to you: the importance of coverage (taking the same shot from multiple angles) to overcome problems you later discover with some shots; the need for care with sound; considering the use of titles quite specifically; the importance of planning materials such as animatics and storyboards; and the use of multimedia within your blog (images, links, podcasts, vodcasts and other video) ...
The sample was well packaged. Thank you. The construction was submitted on DVD whilst an active url was provided to access the candidate’s blog.
The Centre chose the Video brief and the candidate produced a film opening in the horror/thriller genre. It is clear that a detailed framework was accessible by the candidate and that they have enjoyed following it.
The candidate used a blog to present their research and planning. This material was comprehensive with some detailed research demonstrated. However, the candidate could have made more use of this research in their construction, especially with respect to titling. Planning materials were included, but a full storyboard or animatic would have benefited the candidate. The Centre's comments were clear and related to the mark scheme, taking into account weaknesses. Therefore, it was felt that the marking of this element was in line with agreed standards.
The construction was proficient and used the forms and conventions which made it readable as a  horror/thriller. It is clear that candidates are taught to carefully consider aspects of framing, mise-en-scene, and the institutional conventions of titling. However, these were not fully proficient throughout the construction. Some of the framing was not fully considered. In one shot the camera-person could be seen in shadow. Some shots were held too long, whilst others were not cleanly edited. Sound was generally effective, especially non-diegetic, but at times it was clear that diegetic sound had not been monitored – camera noise was audible on some shots. ...
The evaluation covered the set questions and made some attempt to use the available technology. Still images were included in the body of the evaluation and a “podcast” comparing the construction to another candidate’s work was embed in the blog. The Centre could explore presenting the answers to the key questions in a multimedia format in order to allow access to the top level marks. Once again the Centre recognised the shortcomings with this element and marks were agreed.
Overall, the Centre has submitted an enjoyable portfolio of work. It is clear that candidates are well supported and that they respond positively to this. Thank you.

Thursday, 11 March 2010

Various links lists added

If you look to the right you'll see some new links lists have been added (something you should aim to do in your own blog by the way).
You'll find plenty of guides and galleries on titles, opening sequences and logos, and I'll add more to these - and on the art of editing and additional topics - as time permits.
Remember too that there are many links contained within the posts, not to mention the British Cinema blog...

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

Some other schools' AS work

UPDATED 18.1.2011 - SEE BOTTOM
Feel free to add comments on the YouTube page for these - these students are hoping to generate some feedback.
There are 4 examples posted at http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A1A922DFC0D457C2
Some of the effects used can only be achieved using the more advanced software we use at A2; iMovie 06 does not allow video-in-video effects having a single video track only
Horror/thriller

Teen/romance [I note they've used the Nickelodeon logo - they shouldn't!]

Teen action

Thriller/horror [again, they've used actual film co logos - don't do this]


[18.1.2011] SEE ALSO:
Exam Board (OCR) blog for Media Studies - lots of links to other schools'/students' blogs
Past IGS student blogs; links include brief description of genre etc
HurtwoodHouse students' productions

IMAGE RIGHTS PERMISSION FORM

Get anyone and everyone, INCLUDING EXTRAS, to complete and sign one of these, and then pass on to me to keep filed in F6 (if you want to keep for your own records, photocopy before you pass it on). This is a hassle for both you and me ... but is actually good practice, and reflective of actual media practice.

REMEMBER, YOU NEED TO DOWNLOAD THIS + REPLACE THE TEXT [YOUR NAME] WITH...YOUR NAMES!!!

Not simply linking into your graded requirement to make links to the real world of media production, but also as it is an important issue in its own right, please ensure you address the potentially thorny issue of image rights. You may recall having to sign forms for the Film Festival certifying your right to reproduce the image of anyone involved, a standard procedure should you want to screen your work in any context. This is a very serious concern for Media Studies, so either design a form yourself or use this template (derived from Microsoft). I'm in discussions with the school on what to do in the case of under-18s, and will post the outcome of this shortly.

If you google 'image rights form template' you'll find plenty more

Release Form for Media Recording DB Edit As                                                            

Monday, 8 March 2010

The Art of the Vodcast

I've posted on podcasting earlier. A simple but effective idea for a vodcast - incorporating video, not just audio - is to talk through some of the films you've viewed and/or researched, using visual stimuli such as holding up a DVD case. This example is part of a series by a US slasher fan; I don't agree with everything he says (how could he dismiss the almighty Jason X?!), but you could pick up ideas for films to research/view from videos like this. Similar efforts exist for most genres.
Example 1: 'Horror DVD Collection Traditional Slasher Films Part 2'

Example 2: 'Slasher Movie Montage: 1971 - 2001'

This is another nice, simple but highly effective idea, and an alternative to typing your research into a post in the usual way, requiring images loaded into iMovie - though in your case with some explanatory titles added! Its useful to note too the community feel created by the comments such YouTube uploads attract. Many of you will be wondering which are the most useful/relevant films for you to view and study - why not use sites such as this - and even more so forums (see earlier post) to tap into the huge online fanbase for such genres?
You can find useful tips in videos such as 'Top Five Underrated Horror Films (you've probably never seen)' [I haven't linked as there may be some explicit material in this] ... and the comments it attracted, which include many other suggestions
Example 3: 'Top 15 Slasher Movies'

Again, a really simple idea, but could be a fun alternative to the conventional post.
Example 4: Total Film magazine's YouTube channel: episode on rom-coms

This is an excellent resource; some insightful comments here on why certain genres are popular for example.
Example 5: Zombies vs. Vampires
This one takes the approach of comparing and contrasting two sub-genres and their appeal, plus strengths and weaknesses and notable examples, plus historical trends.Some of you are melding differing genres in a hybrid genre, so why not consider something like this?

Example 6: 'Fave Rom-Coms'

Again, you'd want some accompanying text/titles to provide some context (and/or audio commentary), but hopefully you can see the potential of just such an approach.


Taking on any of these approaches will help to make your blog a winner!

Just to round this off, although it is vitally important that you use some books to gain the depth of insight and analysis these provide, I would also encourage you to make good use of YouTube and its equivalents. If you read about a director, a sub-genre, actor or whatever, see if you can find a film on there which might enhance your understanding. As an example, I've cited John Hughes to some of you as a director worth looking into. A great YouTube upload for this is 'Directed by John Hughes', which I haven't linked because it does contain some strong language. If you flick a couple of minutes into the following though, you get a useful compilation, or montage, of his work.

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

AUDIENCE: The Crazies: $12m hit

A real-life eg of importance of defining target aud: The Crazies

MATERIAL SUCH AS THE BELOW IS THE SORT OF THING YOU SHOULD BE REFERENCING WITHIN YOUR AUDIENCE POST/S: CAN YOU SHOW THAT YOUR GENRE IS CURRENTLY POPULAR AND HAS A SUCCESSFUL HISTORY? WHAT RECENT HIT FILMS HAVE THERE BEEN FROM THIS GENRE [PROVIDE FINAL BOX OFFICE FIGURES + BUDGET]...

Yet another reminder of why its so useful to keep dipping into the Film Guardian comes this snippet - which highlights the central importance of having a well-defined target audience:
The Crazies proved once again that concepts, not marquee names, are king at today's multiplex. Despite lacking a big star, it was the only new release this weekend to open at £1m-plus, and the only one to achieve a screen average above £3,000. This remake of a little-seen 1973 George Romero zombie-horror benefited from a clearly defined audience and a lack of competition in the genre market, opening not far behind the debut figure of the 2003 remake of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (£1.36m) and almost dead level with the first weekend of 2006's The Hills Have Eyes (£1.13m). With a production budget estimated by IMDBPro at $12m, the title is likely to be solidly profitable for its investors and international distributors.
Source: Gant, Charles (2010) "The Crazies lurch to UK box office success", The Guardian [online], 2.3.10. Accessed online 2.3.10 at http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/filmblog/2010/mar/02/the-crazies-uk-box-office

To see how the campaign for this film developed, and watch the trailer, see http://www.heyuguys.co.uk/2009/12/21/the-final-poster-for-the-crazies-is-released/

Monday, 1 March 2010

Volunteers wanted...

I'd like to be able to film one performance of the Jekyll and Hyde show (on this Weds-Fri, 730-930ish), perhaps including some behind-the-scenes footage. Any volunteers to film this, and/or operate the boom mike (we'd really need a team for this, as a couple of hours holding this up continuously would be a bit much!). Please add a comment if you're interested, and I'll confirm names tomorrow.

[UPDATE: I've provisionally got Joel, Emmie and Beth for filming on Weds, with Lucy + Helena doing behind-the-scenes material; another 1 or 2 would be useful though]

Saturday, 27 February 2010

A YouTube alternative

Some of you have had difficulties uploadingto/embedding from YouTube; if so, you could try Vimeo as an alternative

Friday, 26 February 2010

FORUMS: For, Um, You!

Have you used any online forums yet? Remember, as a general principle you should aim to demonstrate your use of a wide range of (new) media technologies in the process of creating your production. You might post on a forum to take part in a debate, or even to get some audience feedback (perhaps suggestions for titles, taglines, character names, useful films to watch comparable to your idea, etc)
Some of the links in below (copied from another post) feature forums.
Remember too to try and give some detail of how you go about finding such sites/forums, assuming you're not simply relying on links posted here: detail your search terms, and how you narrow down your results (if relevant)

Just tidying up my bookmarks and thought the following might be useful (if not already posted):
on slashers: http://www.best-horror-movies.com/friday-the-13th-part-2-the-definitive-slasher.html (the site and article; free e-zine to sign up to and a forum); http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.ssf/2009/03/from_monstrous_metaphor_to_bra.html; http://www.eatmybrains.com/showreview.php?id=119 (not the best written, but a very useful site and a forum)
rom-com/'chick flick': http://titirangistoryteller.wordpress.com/film/the-chick-flick/ (useful analysis, including an historical overview, and range of examples) 

Some Sound Advice, and note on boom

On the boom, its strictly 1st come, first served, but no one can book it out twice in a week. You need to see John, preferrably pre-registration, to see if its free and also to book a time with John on the day you want it to run through the set up and use of the boom mic kit.
You can request it a 2nd time in a week, and check with John later in the day if its still free, but anyone else coming at any stage will get priority if you've booked it once that week.

[I trust everyone gets the Basil Brush reference?]

AMBIENT SOUND
Whenever and wherever you are recording there will generally be some ambient sound - background noise generated by the environment you are in - eg computer fans or people walking past in F6; cars, dogs, the wind, leaves rustling outdoors.
For a typical scene you will be cutting together shots taken at different times, even if only a few minutes or even seconds apart. This has consequences...
Say a dog was distantly barking in shot A (x looks at y); you cut to shot B (close-up of y) and back again to A (x looks at y). This shot-reverse shot sequence is meant to appear as all in real-time, continuous action on screen, but this can be easily undermined if the ambient sound is noticeably different between shots A and B (no dog barking in shot B).

Advanced audio editing is a theoretical solution. More practical is recording an audio track for 30secs or so, whatever would be long enough to cover a continuous section, in the environment your scene is set. If you did discover a problem with the sound, you at least have the option of binning the audio track on your footage, and OVERDUBBING this ambient noise track. For any dialogue you'd want to record your actors saying their lines, ideally able to see a screen where they can see themselves and so judge the timing. Lip-synching is a tricky, fiddly business, but your end result is hopefully a more polished piece.
---------------------------------------
Young Britney is of course rather notorious for her lip-synched 'live' performances, an issue which also came to global prominence with the rather disgraceful decision to replace the young singer at the Beijing Olympics opening ceremony with another considered more photogenic.
--------------------------------------
I'm hoping to purchase a portable audio recorder next week with this in mind.

Re-shooting a scene because of scenes is unlikely to be practical; recording sound (if you didn't originally) will not require costumes or getting your actors to some isolated spot, and is a more feasible solution.
------------------------------------------------------------
If you want to link this into the real world of media production you'd do well to consider the spaghetti westerns of Sergio Leone, in some ways a masterpiece of over-dubbing, though not always so well lip-synched. Leone tended to add sound in entirely separately to the shot footage, an immense challenge which he pulls off with real alacrity. There was some controversy when the by now rather old actors recorded some new dialogue for a new cut of one of these.
Bad cases of dubbing are a popular item of discussion on the web; try http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFFz-MpRZFk for example, or http://www.japanator.com/bad-dubbing-the-worst-professional-dub-in-the-world-finnish-digimon-5874.phtml Some 'voiceover artists' have acquired quite a following, eg Paul Frees.
When the Conservative government insisted that Sinn Fein members could not speak on TV, an outraged media responded by using actors to over-dub the transcript of whatever they said, in some cases using deliberately daft accents to do so to make clear their utter disdain for the policy (which was eventually overturned) [some articles on this: 1 2 3 4 5 This BBC article is a good summary; wiki on the broadcasting ban]

And I almost resisted the temptation to post this trivia question: which rhythmically global one-hit wonder, featuring Norman Cook (aka Fatboy Slim) had a huge hit with "Dub Be Good To Me"?

Wednesday, 24 February 2010

Quoting and providing sources

Whether you're directly quoting (using quote marks if within a sentence or indenting - blogger provides a quote tool to indent any highlighted text [also change the font if you do]) from anything you've read, you should provide a full reference (details of where it came from). As I'm blogging across 30+ blogs I don't always for the sake of speed, but you should!
The basic details you're looking to provide are:
  1. author/s or editor/s
  2. year of publication (or full dd/mm/yyyy if newspaper/web)
  3. title of article (in "" or Italics)
  4. for books, place of publication + publisher
  5. page number/s
  6. URL and date accessed online if web
  7. for films, always give director's surname and year of release (in brackets) after the 1st mention of a title in any post (no need to repeat within a post, but do within a new post)
Use the guide below for more
Referencing & Bibliography                                                            
I might add further resources later

    Friday, 12 February 2010

    Blog Checklist

    I'll upload a definitive version of this over the hols, but for now this draft version should help@
    Blog Course Work Checklist as Feb 2010                                                            
    k

    Wednesday, 10 February 2010

    Tapes now for sale @ £2ea

    To save you having to buy 5 for £15 (Tescos) I've bought a few which you buy off Jan at £2 each

    Accessing John for equipment + technical help

    First of all please ensure you use the correct door for the staffroom, and do not enter the main staffroom itself. If John is not there, do not ask staff where he is, and, crucially, be quiet!!! There have been complaints from other staff. Try to give John advance notice of any requirements; to this end it would be useful to use John's email: john.cockshaw@ilkleygs.ngfl.ac.uk

    Adding audio to your blog

    Basically, you need to create an MP3 file, upload this to a site which will give you an embed code- I suggest www.divshare.com - and then copy/paste in the embed code.

    The two screenshots show you how this works; as with Scribd the upload is very simple; you now click on more options and  you'll see the box in the 2nd screen shot appear - now just copy the embed code.

    I'll test this out with a random music track...[14th Feb: changed this; must have mistyped the email adrs on the account sign up]





    As you may well be using a video camera to record your audio, an alternative to extracting the audio track and putting it through GarageBand/iTunes is to add some relevant stills to the imported track within Final Cut (preferrably - try to start using this!), upload it to YouTube and use the embed code it generates. You're also then using additional new media for your project.

    How to convert your audio file to mp3

    You can import your file into iTunes where you can convert it ... but you have to change some settings to do this.
    Open iTunes
    Click 'iTunes' on the top menu
    Click 'Preferences' from the drop-down list
    Look under the General tab for 'import settings'
    By default, iTunes will convert files to the aac format ... no good ...
    So change this to mp3 from the drop-down menu

    Quicker still, import an audio file into iTunes, click ADVANCED and select CONVERT TO MP3

    UPDATE 18TH JAN 2011: Blogger provides a guide to audio/podcasting, including a set of links to several audio hosting/upload sites: http://www.google.com/support/blogger/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=80259

    PROBLEMS WITH GETTING AN EMBED CODE - OR GETTING THE EMBED CODE TO WORK?
    If you're struggling to generate an embed code its very likely because the file you've uploaded isn't an MP3! ALWAYS EXPORT AND USE MP3 FILES FOR PODCASTS!
    Also, if you copy a post from a group colleague you may find that the embedded audio in their post doesn't appear in yours - you simply need to copy/paste in the actual embed code again - to repost this post across 3 blogs, I had to go into the EDIT HTML tab, find that code and copy it.

    Monday, 8 February 2010

    Mini-DV tapes

    I've just ordered 20 of these to sell on to yourselves at £2 each, much cheaper than Tescos and saving you from having to buy a multipack. As noted in the letter home, none will be given out/loaned otherwise.

    Sunday, 7 February 2010

    Please check your blog title

    Log into your blog, click CUSTOMISE from the top menu, then SETTINGS; your blog title should be G321 Forename Surname - check you've done this, and add the two spaces if yours reads G321ForenameSurname

    The blog title must include a space between words!!!

    Sunday, 31 January 2010

    Blogger gadgets

    Apparently one of the blogger gadgets has been linked with a virus, so please stick only to using the Links Lists gadget for now

    Wednesday, 20 January 2010

    TASK 3: Film Openings Presentations [due MON 1st Feb]

    You'll shortly receive a copy of the document embedded below; no need to print this off, and I'm only publishing this now for the benefit of any of you who like to work ahead of yourselves.
    We'll screen your sweded films on Monday, and then discuss your answers to the simple questions for Task 2 on Tuesday. You'll have Friday to work on the presentation task in class, and you'll do these presentations starting Monday 1st Feb.

    YOU MUST SELECT A FILM FROM THE NOUGHTIES!!!

    No two people will present on the same film, so as soon as you let me know which film you want to present on (you need to have the Region 2 DVD to play the opening or, better still, use software to extract the opening and save as an MP4/avi/Quictime file), I'll add details to the list below the document.
    On Weds/Thurs next week I'll demonstrate, using some random film openings, the sort of things you should consider - and get the ball rolling on your investigation into the codes and conventions of film openings.

    Remember, from this point on, everything you do, whether in class or as homework, needs to be blogged!


    In the Beginning There Was - As Film Opening Presn Guidelines Compressed                                                         

    PRESENTATION LIST
    KASIM ALI                                   - ALI G INDAHOUSE
    JONATHAN BAILEY                   - HOT FUZZ
    JAMIE BALDOCK                       - HUMAN TRAFFIC
    LAURA BIRTWISTLE                  - BURN AFTER READING
    AMY BLYSZKO                          - FOOL'S GOLD
    EMMIE BRYETT                         - THE UGLY TRUTH
    ALEX BURKE                             - THE MATRIX
    MEGAN CLAYDON                   - LOVE ACTUALLY
    JOEL COLBORNE                     - ANCHORMAN
    BETH COOPER                          - ROCK N ROLLA
    EMMA GRAVELLING               - WHERE THE HEART IS
    KANE GRIFFITHS-STUBBS     - SHAUN OF THE DEAD
    MELISSA HODGSON               - THE DIVINE SECRETS OF THE YA-YA SISTERHOOD
    JONATHAN HUGHES              - DONNIE DARKO
    MARY JENNER                        - WITHNAIL AND I
    CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE   - VAN HELSING
    LUCY MANNALL                     - MARLEY AND ME
    ELIZABETH McPHAIL              - STEP UP
    STEPHANIE MEARES              - SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE
    ROBBIE MILLER                      - GLADIATOR
    CALLUM MOREMAN             - NIGHT WATCH
    JENNIFER ROBERTS               - THE NOTEBOOK
    GEORGE SCAIFE                    - JURASSIC PARK
    VANESSA SEADON               - THE PROPOSAL

    Task 2: Your Filmic Tastes [deadline Tues 26th Jan]

    Once we're through the sweding task (I've added some detail on what to blog), there are two key areas to thoroughly research and consider before a camera is picked up again: the codes and conventions of film openings (and of your chosen genre/s specifically) and the whole business of generating ideas you might turn into a film opening.
    To kickstart this, you should consider where your natural interests lie; which genre/s will you enjoy working on for the next few months? It won't necessarily be the case that you end up working within a genre that you are familiar with - it is also vital that your idea enables you to read up on and comment about conventions of a genre - but it won't do any harm!
    So, a very simple task, leading on to a more demanding task...

    TASK 2: YOUR FILMIC TASTES
    (1) List the last 5 movies you've seen
    (2) What was the last movie you paid to go and see in the cinema?
    (3) What are your favourite TWO film genres?
    (4) What are your all-time top FIVE films?
    (5) Which ONE of these is your absolute favourite ... and why (be fairly detailed on why!)*

    This will lead onto a task involving your screening the opening 2 mins of a film of your choice, explaining in detail what this tells us about the codes and conventions of (1) film openings in general and (2) the genre specifically...

    *I'm sure you'll all agree with me (and Guardian writer John Moore) that Withnail and I is the best movie of all time! (It will shortly be arriving in the Library!)

    Sweding task: a note on blogging

    Absolutely everything we do from now until your work is submitted should be reflected on your blog, with the sweding task no exception.

    You should comment on:
    • what is sweding/where does the term come from
    • provide links to (better still, embed) an example/s from YouTube (from home!) or alternatives
    • your initial shortlist of possible films
    • detail your 30sec pitch
    • what film did you go with and why
    • any initial reflections on using iMovie and the camcorders/tripods themselves?
    • once your finished piece is saved as a QuickTime file, upload and embed this
    • either give precise timings or cut a shorter film with the prelim task featured, making sure you explain what each of the required terms mean
    • in due course you will have to analyse how you developed from this prelim task to the main production, so good notes now will help!
    • with this in mind, make some brief notes on what you've learned in general from this task
    • if this actually was your main production what would you do differently?
    From the very start, try to ensure your blog is fully multimedia and well illustrated with relevant* images; avoid at all costs long continuous paragraphs - feel free to use bullet points!!!

    *you can always try quirky too, such as the vegetable variety of swede pictured here...

    Monday, 18 January 2010

    Tips and reflections from the Class of 2009

    I'm rather hoping that the current A2 bunch will dedicate some of their time and know-how to pass on production pointers...
    They did do rather well, the bulk getting As and Bs, so are well worth listening to!
    (And of course you can still buy copies of their tremendous work on DVD for a bargain 300 new pence!)

    Friday, 15 January 2010

    Getting Started: A Touch of Sweding

    After all your hard work leading up to the exam, and to see us through the remainder of the exam period when classes will be disrupted to a degree, we switch focus to the coursework unit (worth 50% of the AS), and ease our way in with a hopefully rather fun task...

    As the document below details, 'sweding' is the term for recreating (typically in a humorous way) movies in a low-tech, zero-budget fashion, and that is what you are going to attempt to research, plan, shoot and edit by the end of Thursday 21st, to screen on Friday 22nd!

    You could make a real headstart on your coursework by incorporating the Preliminary Task within this - use the document to get details of this (and start a new coursework folder to keep handouts such as this).

    Before we embark on the couursework, one crucial point to remember: the practical work must reflect what you've learnt from the theory (exam-based) unit; 40% of the marks for your coursework are based on written work, not the film production itself.

    As Cwk Overview Jan 2010